One of the greatest challenges facing the struggling teen industry is the lack of conscientious, constructive, and sustained oversight at regular intervals by external organizations.

One of the greatest challenges facing the struggling teen industry is the lack of conscientious, constructive, and sustained oversight at regular intervals by external organizations. Oversight may help prevent the occasional scandals and abuses that have occurred in some programs and schools.  The principal challenge is to design oversight that does not produce a controlling, intrusive bureaucracy that stifles creativity and vision, drains staff attention from direct care and relationship building with teens, and merely produces tomes of meaningless paperwork.


The most ambitious attempt to address oversight and regulation issues comes from the Alliance for the Safe, Therapeutic, and Appropriate Use of Residential Treatment (ASTART) under the auspices of the University of South Florida (USF) and the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law.  In 2005 the organization sponsored a press briefing in Washington, D.C. about the urgent need for regulation of private residential treatment facilities. The allied organizations were seeking an investigation into these facilities by the Government Accountability Office.   Among the compelling statements made at the briefing were these:

I have become increasingly alarmed by the reports of youth being transported hundreds, if not thousands of miles away from their home, often after being awakened in the middle of the night by hired “escorts,” to be taken to unlicensed and non-accredited residential programs that have somehow persuaded their desperate parents that they offer the best hope for helping their children. . . . I have heard from young adults who were in some of these programs as adolescents, from parents who sent their children to these programs, from former staff members of these programs, and from numerous journalists who have investigated these programs. . . .The stories of mistreatment, abuse, and even death within these programs have been so compelling that I could not turn away from trying to learn more. . . .


Many programs . . . are neither licensed by their state, nor accredited by independent national accreditation organizations, and . . . some of these programs are exploiting the desperation of parents, and mistreating the youth that they serve. The issue is that we don’t even know how many youngsters are living in these programs, or how many have died in them. . . .


We must ensure that programs that present themselves as serving children with special challenges are licensed by the state in which they are located, and accredited by independent national accrediting organizations. We recognize that even with oversight there will be tragedies but we view such oversight as one part of a multi-faceted effort to protect the safety and well-being of our young people.

—Robert Friedman, professor/chair, Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida

Think of what youth must experience in programs where they are expected to live by standards common in the prisons for the worst offenders, or in the former Soviet gulag. Think of the impact when youth are subject to unskilled or abusive interventions for normative behaviors that violate rules that are supportive of healthy adolescent development. Think of the impact on those youth who have been beaten, raped, or physically harmed in programs where staff, who may not have the barest training or moral qualities to make them fit for working with youth, are out of control. Think of the impact on families when a troubled youth sent to such a program is returned in a coffin. Such is the situation in many so-called special schools and residential programs for troubled youth in this country.


It is our hope that we can see such terrible facilities closed down when examined and found lacking reasonable standards of care for troubled youth.

—Charles Huffine, M.D., child and adolescent psychiatrist

I am here today, not as just another concerned mental health professional, but as one who has worked within unregulated residential treatment facilities and experienced first-hand compelling concern for the inadequate and harmful care of youth in such facilities. . . .


I was sickened as I witnessed counseling staff at the 6 week wilderness intervention program be told that every child about to complete it should and must be referred to the 2-year programs at one of the 3 boarding schools, regardless of the clinical improvements they were supposed to have made during their . . . brief stay. I watched tearful mothers lament that they wanted to bring their child home to try to “repair” their relationship and rebuild—only to have program staff manipulate them by threatening that their child might end up in jail or dead if they didn’t send them to a boarding school.


Each day at this job brought new discomfort. Scared and confused, I called several governing organizations from a campus phone and whispered hushed concerns to agency representatives only to be told that emotional growth boarding schools in Idaho were not regulated at that time by their mental health or education agencies and that they could do nothing about my concerns.

—Nicki Bush, former program staff member


  1. The alternative to being in a
    The alternative to being in a “safe environment” is having your teen in your own home. This is the place where they have cultivated their behaviors. The greatest crime is to bring them home to the same environment that they failed to succeed at originally. It is not an easy journey. Our son returned, relapsed and died.

  2. This is one of the most
    This is one of the most considerable issues related to these teens schools and programs. Struggling teenagers join in these programs to make themselves come out of the problems with specialized treatments, counseling services and various helpful programs but instead of that these programs are making teens to experience various types of new problems that are creating horrible problems with teenagers. In my view, the government should take strong actions by verifying the schools and programs by taking teens suggestions on the offered programs and also parents need to choose a specialized and well reputed programs rather choosing a program in hurry to get rid of troubled teenagers

  3. You will experience the
    You will experience the highest standards of safety and therapy in one of the most beautiful and powerful settings for real change. Wilderness programs help young people by giving them a set of outdoor challenges, outlet for their rage, a different environment, and a time to find themselves again. Being in

  4. The comment prior this one
    The comment prior this one looks like it’s from a program, it clearly isn’t someone aware of the deaths and abuse that occurs at so many of these places.

    Did you hear China is copying us now? That Internet Addiction treatment that got the boy killed? It was featured in WIRED, I also saw recently that one wilderness camp is recruiting families from other countries to send their kids there, how is THAT good for international relations?

    Someone said something above about youth being expected to live in prison like standards, there are actually quite a few differences:

    *No access to phones (in jail they get ‘one call’ right?)
    *No regulation or rules about what is or isn’t ok
    *No rules protecting religious freedom or freedom of speech (in many cases looking at someone can get you into BIG trouble)

    There’s many more, but at least in prisons I hear there are some gangs right? So the inmates are able to bond and have some sort of relationship? In these places kids are taught more of a kill or be killed type concept.

    Regarding the child who (RIP) died after coming home…was it because they went home or because of what happened where they got sent before that which was never dealt with?

    Often kids come out thinking that things are good, that they grew and learned something. Often this is the child having learned to be obedient and submissive to survive, and under the surface, sometimes taking years to be uncovered, their true self is suffering, stifled and afraid to talk about what happened.

    Please find local resources to help with your child, and stay involved, it’s not just the kid with the problem and treating them like they are won’t help anyone in the long run, unless it’s just all about what it ‘looks like’ and parents don’t want to admit their part, which is sad but often true.

  5. louis vuitton uk are

    louis vuitton uk

    are diversified in various kinds, handbags, backpacks, portable bags, purses, wallets and pouches. All kinds are popular among the whole word people.After the death of his father, Georges

    louis vuitton

    began a campaign to build the company into a worldwide corporation, exhibiting the company’s products at the Chicago World’s Fair in 1893. This client oriented and faith rooted store aims at providing the best LV goods and services, such as top class

    louis vuitton uk

    and free shipping.Don’t be stung online. there’s no real need to rush

    louis vuitton outlet

    .If you can’t walk into a store in or around your local region, online is your only other real-time alternative. There are some multifunction pockets inside these

    sac louis vuitton

    . They can provide you our equal part style, and they are fashionable and useful.After the death of his father, Georges

    louis vuitton

    began a campaign to build the company into a worldwide corporation, exhibiting the company’s products at the Chicago World’s Fair in 1893. Louis Vuitton is one of the world’s leading international fashion houses.The catching styles and upmarket qualities endeared

    louis vuitton uk

    to almost everyone.In 1867, the company participated in the universal exhibition in Paris.

    louis vuitton

    To protect against the duplication of his look, he changed the Trianon design to a beige and brown stripes design in 1876. Nowadays

    louis vuitton bags

    become more and more fashionable all over the world. They are luxury leather goods known for women’s handbags and wallets.Further products became introduced such as the Taiga leather line in 1993, and the literature collection of Voyager Avec… in 1994. In 1996,

    louis vuitton

    the celebration of the Centennial of the Monogram Canvas was held in seven cities worldwide. In 2004,

    louis vuitton wallet

    celebrated its 150th anniversary. The brand also inaugurated stores in New York City (on Fifth Avenue), S?o Paulo, Mexico City, Cancun and Johannesburg.An LVMH spokeswoman interviewed by New York Magazine said that

    louis vuitton belt

    were forced to take legal action when Plesner did not respond to their original request to remove the contested image, nor to the subsequent Cease and desist order. 

Comments are closed.